Categories
Movies Music

Birds of Prey and the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn

TLDR, go see it.

Like a lot of entertainment these days. If it interests, then go.

Its a genuinely entertaining movie. Margot Robbie unleashes the full spectacle that is Harley Quinn because they got an MA15+ rating. Thats an R in the US apparently.

Its definitely not a kids film. Theres some violence, drinking, drug references and a good sprinkling of the F bomb. But neither is there nudity or extreme graphic violence.

Robbie is almost transcendent as Harley. Its a role she fits like a glove. A lot like Hugh Jackman as Wolverine. Its a kind of, “Whoaw. Where did that come from.”. Where the character gives the actor full lee way and they don’t put a foot wrong.

The movie captures Harley spot on. Following her as she deals with her break up with the Joker. The story kicking up a gear when its clear she no longer has Mr J’s protection. The Birds of Prey forming as a consequence.

Stop reading from here on down as I’m going to discuss a little deeper. *SPOILERS COMING, sorta*.

DC took away a lot of lessons from Suicide Squad. Both have a lot to like about the concept. As comics, they’ve done well.

Crucially where Suicide Squad veered off into standard “save the world” territory and hits problems. Birds of Prey keeps it to the characters and stays away from generic superhero movie tropes.

The movie isn’t without its faults.

Its a juggle to do justice to this many characters when Harley is clearly the star. The results are mixed based on the screen time and what they were given to do.

Every actor brought great presence and good comic chops. This version of the Birds of Prey is very much a remix. Jurnee Smollett-Bell (Black Canary) is a stand out.

Cassandra Cain isn’t the comics version. Cass here is very much a character put together for this movie. Ella Jay Basco is street smart and feisty in the role though. Where they go by the end is more difficult to say.

It suffers from the usual under developed bad guy. Ewan McGregor is solid. He isn’t phoning it in. The Black Mask and his sidekick, Victor Zsasaz, just don’t have all that much to do other than be menacing. Even then, McGregor is likeable.

Any movie featuring a large cast of women seems to get a lot of criticism nowadays. BoP is unashamedly all about the ladies. But I don’t think its going all out on the gender politics.

I don’t rate a movie based on its box office or buy into all the conjecture. The Deadpool movies suffer a lot of the same problems. Yet they get a pass.

Hopefully we get to see more of Harley and the ladies of Gotham.

BTW the soundtrack is a corker.

Categories
Hardware Movies Software Tech VFX

Virtual Production of the Mandalorian

So a major proportion of the Mandalorian was shot on a virtual set. Whats different is the technological leap forward thats come from throwing together a stage surrounded by high resolution screens, a game engine and motion sensing attached to the movie camera.

Whats been achieved is essentially the holodeck. The secret sauce is the Unreal game engine. Virtually any place indoor or outdoor can be displayed. At any time of the day. That scene can also be dynamically adjusted or changed to suit whatever’s required.

The displayed background reacts to camera movement in real time based on the position sensing rig connected to it. This simulates the relative view as if the camera were actually on site.

This is being called “real pixels”. The actors can see and react to the final set rather than having to imagine it as they would with a green screen set.

Perhaps Terence Stamp could be persuaded to do a block buster now that actors’ don’t need to work with tennis balls on sticks.

Theres less work in getting the final takes because most all of it is shot in camera. The LCD screens are bright enough to light the set and the details reflect realistically. Something that needs heavy post production with green screens.

Whats more remarkable is that the screen resolution is enough to register bokeh and depth of field. Although at times, the technology wasn’t trusted enough to deliver true fidelity and they leaned on shallow depth of field to mask any perceived imperfections.

In essence, within the size of the set. Any scene can be shot in a controlled environment that can be reproduced. Crews no longer have to wait for golden hour. Golden hour is now twenty four by seven.

Back projected scenes are perfectly reproducible. The same on the first take and the last.

The trade off for this flexibility is that the scene designs need to be close to final. In order that they can be projected and shot with.

Production technology has slowly been building to this. Gravity used an early small scale version of this idea. Mainly focused on getting the required footage of actors responding to scenes.

This was dubbed the “light box”. A large enough LCD screen filled box that encompassed an actor and camera crew. Strong enough to light the scene and to simulate what was happening for the actors to respond to.

Gravity was heavily computer generated and composited to achieve the deep space visuals that Alfonso Cuaron wanted. It was so good it took the Oscar for best visual FX.

Large scale projection has been used in many movies to give scenes that extra visual impact. With new projectors they’re reaching a scale where they can fill huge sound stages.

In Oblivion, the Sky Tower is a floating base situated above the clouds.

Andrea Riseborough’s Victoria and Tom Cruise’s Jack have many discussions at all times of day on this base. Whats striking is the views from the floor to ceiling windows.

These wrap around views were achieved by projecting pre-shot visuals from a Hawaiian mountain top. This could have easily been achieved with green or blue screen but the colour spill would have required huge amounts of work to remove.

Similarly the recent Star Wars films made use of the same technique for the Millennium Falcon cockpit scenes. The Falcon cockpit set had a wrap around projected screen. This lit the set and allowed the actors to see what was actually happening.

Even Parasite, a modern day drama set in South Korean society has significant amounts of VFX.

Bong Joon Ho leans heavily on VFX to create the visual language in many of his movies. Where Snow Piercer relies on the back to front of a train to signify social status, in Parasite he uses height. Both in terms of camera movement and character perspective / points of view.

I was amazed to learn that both houses don’t actually exist. They’re sets designed to facilitate the visual metaphors the director wanted.

Parasite could be filmed without the effects and be just as affecting. Which is a tribute to the script.

The effects are over all more subtle. But effective nonetheless. Allowing the director more scope to express himself.

Even for John Wick which bills itself on Keanu Reeve’s extraordinary stunt work and physicality. Parabellum makes use of VFX to give us extraordinary action scenes.

Arguably theres more VFX in Parabellum than in the Matrix. But I can’t argue that it doesn’t have a place in making a great movie.

We get to have outlandish knife fight scenes where no one actually gets stabbed.

Visual effects are at this point an indispensable tool. It lets film makers achieve shots that otherwise wouldn’t be available. I don’t think we’d see anything as epic as Avengers Endgame if we didn’t.

Whats new is that visual effects are now reaching a point where it can be shot in camera. There’ll be much less need for “We’ll fix it in post”.

Categories
Movies Music

21st Century Boy

Finn Wolfhard regularly gets together with a couple of mates and plays music. Currently six and a half million views on just one of their songs.

So a Weezer cover of AHA’s “Take on Me” featuring Calpurnia in the video. Currently seventeen and a half million views. Guess I’m not the only one who likes it.

Music in the 21st century. Alls I can say is, I’m so very old.

Categories
Hardware Software Tech

GPU wars 2020

Nvidia have had a firm grip on the GPU market for some time. Having not had any real competition. They’ve promoted and command huge mind share.

However AMD have been upping their game over the last almost two years. Enough to push Nvidia to fast track its GPU roadmap. Phasing out some of its initial RTX offerings and putting out tweaked “Super” versions of their cards as AMD were bringing out their initial NAVI GPUs.

Nvidia then filling out its low to mid range GPU offerings as AMD announced theirs. What was interesting was that Nvidia felt no shame as what they brought to market was upgraded GTX10 series cards.

Running counter to their own marketing that RTX was the future.

So Nvidia have been playing cat and mouse with AMD for many months. Countering AMD’s offerings just before they’re actually released. Basing their products on AMD’s announcements.

However with this latest round, Level1Tech’s posed an interesting question. “Did AMD purposefully blindside Nvidia through last minute software revisions and pricing to improve the 5600XT.”.

As they’ve said, the only issue is how many customers would actually apply a BIOS update to get that 10%+ performance boost.

Arguably all of this has been great for the consumer. Especially since the bad old days of cryptocurrency mining where GPUs were stupidly expensive. If there was any stock to be had.

On pure price / performance, AMD have a solid range. However Nvidia have done significant work differentiating their GPUs based on use. This does come at a premium though.

Nvidia keep and maintain strong relationships with software companies. Working with not just games but also utilities and productivity.

Everything from ray tracing Minecraft. CUDA technology incorporated into Adobe Creative suite and machine learning acceleration.

My only question would be, “Does the new crop of GPUs really justify the prices?”. Nvidia are arguably artificially keeping prices high as a holdover from the crypto mining days.

All said and done. The PC consumer is in a very good place at the start of this new decade. There hasn’t been this level of competition and choice in some time.

Categories
Hardware Tech

Mac Pro – Just how pro?

So Mac Pro day has come and gone. Its taken awhile to get my head around just what exactly the 2019 Mac Pro does and where it fits.

Workstation. HEDT. Theres a lot of categories and even more user expectations.

On the face of it. The Mac Pro, especially the base configuration, is an extraordinary bad value. The single core and multi core benchmarks are pretty average. Factor in the price of the base config in your country and, yeah. Its looks very hard to justify.

Apple have done themselves a disservice with the Pro name. Across the product range its applied to mean various things.

With iPads, its a nebulous range of additional features that don’t really distinguish the iPad Pro all that much from the more mundane models. There’s just the horrendous price.

Similarly, the Pro in the iPhone 11 range denoting the premium line. Again, the price to features being a little nebulous. Just expensive.

The Macbooks are a lot clearer. The Macbook Pros are the most capable. Especially the 2019 16 inch Macbook Pro. However they are priced as a mainstream device. The balance of processor, memory and storage for the relative price is bearable.

This diverges more with the iMacs. The iMac Pro is kitted out similarly to the Mac Pro with workstation grade internals. Running a Xeon processor and ECC memory. It offers a good value proposition in terms of processor, memory and storage, even for its steep base price.

Its biggest issue is that it requires an Apple technician to do upgrades.

As an aside, the elephant in the room for the iMac Pro is “Does it have a future?”. Theres been no update for some time.

Enter the Mac Pro. Its clearly a workstation and the price paid is for all the engineering thats gone into its design.

As Quinn’s video shows and iFixIt’s rating confirms. The Mac Pro is totally user serviceable. Initial testing is confirming that its capable of handling loads easily without sounding like a jet engine.

Viewed from this angle. As a purely commercial workstation. The Mac Pro makes sense.

The problem is that configurability is table stakes in the PC world. For general computing and hobbyists, its hard to justify. Its something thats a given with high end desktops.

Part of the overall problem is on Intel. The glacial pace of the Xeon roadmap and supporting chip set features. Its hard not to look at what AMD Ryzen and Threadripper bring to the table.

Performance is very much on par with the chip specs. Single core scores are tied to clock speed and multi-core scales out with the number of cores on tap.

There are still other trade offs. For example, Nvidia have done significant work to accelerate machine learning. However Apple have intentionally disallowing support for their GPUs.

The Mac Pro is competitive in key areas like video editing. Some features like the Afterburner card and custom dual GPUs are a clear advantage.

However its harder to say beyond that. There are as many options at any and all price points if macOS isn’t mandatory. All of which are flexible.

While Apple forces its customers to make sacrifices at all price points.

The Mac Pro comes at a huge premium for its flexibility. Hard to justify beyond the small market that can. Which is a shame as it still leaves a huge unfulfilled customer market.

Categories
Hardware Tech

We now return you to your regularly scheduled MacBook Pro

Finally.

Apple doesn’t like to admit that it’s wrong, but will be the first to let you know when it’s made an improvement.” – Jason Snell.

Apple having dialled the balance between form and function back some. They’ve continued the trend started with the iMac Pro.

Seemingly the same from the outside. The internals have been significantly changed. The MBP has now been allowed to grow slightly larger and heavier.

This is to accomodate:

  1. The largest allowable battery by the FAA.
  2. Redesigned thermals to handle the current Intel CPUs.
  3. Better speakers and microphone(s).
  4. New 16″ display.

The new default GPUs are the latest AMD 5000M series.

So the elephant in the room. The Magic Keyboard. The biggest talking point. Immediately obvious is the different layout and the return of the scissor switch.

The MacBook Pro has been my daily driver since its inception. Yes. I’m that old.

However this last generation of MacBooks have been difficult to live with. Even harder to recommend. Sure its a minor annoyance to deal with a soft escape key and a keyboard prone to jamming.

I’ve been grinning and bearing it rather then doing without my machine while its being repaired.

Laptops are inherently compromised. But the Macbook Pro’s combination of portability and power is just hard to beat. As much as I’ve researched alternatives. I keep coming back to it. Faults and all.

Its great to see Apple revisiting their usability decisions again. They’re actually taking on board customer feedback.

The biggest change is that I finally don’t feel like it’s constantly fighting me. Its design doesn’t feel spiteful.” – Marco Arment.

Then theres the pricing. Huge surprise. The 16″ replaces the 15″. Here in Australia, its only a small price premium over the outgoing models.

Guess I better go put an order in.

Categories
General Tech

Scandi office design

Polestar definitely adhere to that Scandinavian aesthetic. Steve Jobs would be proud. Where Pixar allows its staff to tailor their work spaces, Polestar follow an even more focused philosophy.

Everyone hot desks. At the end of the day, the expectation is to pack up completely and clean up.

Its an interesting dynamic aimed at focusing everyone on the tasks at hand. Looking at the vehicles, it certainly looks to carry across.

They’re out doing Volvo at their own designs. Largom, indeed.

Polestar 1
Polestar 2
Categories
Hardware Tech

AMD delivers more kicking to Intel

Courtesy of Techpowerup. AMD are pretty much hitting every CPU bracket just in time for Christmas.

High end desktop – Ryzen 9 3950X. An AM4 socket CPU with 16 core / 32 threads. A clock-speed of 3.50 GHz base, with 4.70 GHz maximum boost frequency, at 105 W TDP. Priced at $749US.

Note the retail box package won’t come with a cooling solution. AMD recommends at least a 240 mm x 140 mm AIO liquid CPU cooler.

Available from November 25, 2019.

Budget desktop – Athlon 3000G is an unlocked 2 core / 4 thread CPU. Base clock is 3.5Ghz. Its running a Vega 3 integrated GPU. Not overly powerful but for $49US its a solid option for a NAS, HTPC or low end desktop.

Available from November 19, 2019.

High end work station / server – 3rd generation Threadripper. These are for the really good boys and girls. Requiring a new sTRX4 socket but compatible with existing TR4 coolers. That cooler will need to be a beefy one as AMD are rating these new CPUs at 280 watts TDP.

These will need the new TRX40 chipset motherboards. Supports quad channel DDR4 memory up to 2Tb. ECC if its really needed. It also brings PCIe4 support as well. Note TRX40 is not compatible with older Threadrippers.

3960X is a 16 core / 32 thread CPU for $1399US. Running at 3.80 GHz base with up to 4.50 GHz maximum boost.

3970X is a 32 core / 64 thread CPU for $1999US. Running at 3.70 GHz base, and 4.50 GHz maximum boost frequency.

Available November 25, 2019.

Neato bonus feature. Zen 2 ECO mode. This will be a configurable TDP control in the Ryzen Master software. Any processor higher than a Ryzen 5 3500 can be capped at 65 watts on the fly. A no brainer feature really. A little like cylinder deactivation in a car.

Categories
Software Tech

Office Mobile unites them all

Microsoft announced at Ignite, a single mobile app for its entire office suite. Including Outlook. All up, it’ll save some screen space.

Note that there are some limitations. This is likely to change so remember, search is your friend.

This now gets a little confusing. There is also a free version of Office for Windows devices with screens less than 10″. As of time of writing, its still available. Whether it gets updates is possibly another story. Even with the Surface Go still being around.

But certainly it continues Microsoft’s focus less of operating systems and more on services.

Categories
Hardware Software Tech

Surface Device rundown

A good overview of some of the new Surface hardware that was announced.

A little more on whats under the hood of the Surface Pro X, Surface Pro 7 and Laptop 3.

As handy as the Pro 7 looks. The Laptop 3 15″ looks more useful to me. The bigger screen and discrete GPU are big pluses. Along with a design allowing service. That goes a long way towards peace of mind in the future.